Showing posts with label Ziebell. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Ziebell. Show all posts

Tuesday, September 4, 2012

Ziebell suspension a sad day for football: Scott

Updated July 19, 2012 20:19:52

North Melbourne AFL coach Brad Scott says Jack Ziebell's suspension is an indictment on the game and could force coaches to tell players that going hard at the ball should no longer be their main focus.

The star midfielder was controversially slapped with a four-game penalty at Tuesday's tribunal hearing after being charged with rough conduct for a head-high clash with Carlton's Aaron Joseph.

"He's devastated. It was a bitterly disappointing day and a really sad day in my mind for AFL football," Scott told reporters on Thursday as the ninth-placed Kangaroos prepared for Sunday's MCG clash with 11th-placed Richmond.

"It strikes at the heart of what this game's about.

"I've never ever seen a player get suspended for making the ball his sole objective, attacking the ball with ferocity, but being punished for the incidental contact that occurred because of that attitude in going for the ball.

"It has been a core fundamental of our game since the game has been invented, that you can attack the ball with ferocity provided you keep your eyes on the ball at all times and you make the ball your sole intention."

Asked if a rule change was necessary, Scott said: "That depends on the groundswell of public opinion as to the way they want the game played."

Scott said the tribunal had ruled Ziebell was contesting the ball.

Ziebell did have a reasonable alternative, which was to wait for Joseph to grab the ball and then tackle him, Scott added.

"To suggest that there's a reasonable alternative is to suggest that those sort of players shouldn't be ... so ferocious in their attack on the ball," Scott said.

"Perhaps we need to re-write the coaching manual. Go back and tell players 'no, it's not about keeping your eyes on the ball and attacking it with ferocity - it's about making sure you don't hurt your opponent'."

Scott said he had heard the argument that if the Ziebell incident was a marking contest, he would have not been suspended.

"It is farcical," Scott said.

Scott said the Kangaroos had counselled Ziebell after his suspension in 2011 for a high bump on St Kilda's Nick Riewoldt.

"We said 'Jack you cannot do that, you cannot line up an opposition player, run past the ball and make him your sole focus'," Scott said.

"He is now saying to me 'I did what you said, I made the ball my sole focus, I attacked it and now I'm not allowed to play for four weeks'.

"That's an indictment, in my view."

The AFL has sent please-explain letters to North's Drew Petrie and Geelong's James Kelly for criticising Ziebell's ban on Twitter.

AAP

Tags: sport, australian-football-league, north-melbourne-3051, vic, australia

First posted July 19, 2012 15:19:26


View the original article here

AFL clears Ziebell case tweeters

Updated July 20, 2012 19:11:55

The AFL has cleared North Melbourne pair Drew Petrie and Majak Daw and Geelong's James Kelly for comments made on Twitter earlier this week.

The players tweeted their disapproval of a four-week suspension handed to Kangaroo Jack Ziebell by the AFL tribunal for his challenge on Carlton's Aaron Joseph.

The AFL has said the comments made by the players were not in breach of any rules or regulations.

Shortly after the verdict, Kangaroos skipper Petrie tweeted: "Advice for @jackziebell. Stop being so courageous and playing footy hard the way it's meant to be played. Please turn into a softy!"

Daw also came to his team-mate's defence: "Can't not comprehend the match reviews (sic) decision over @jackziebell. 4 weeks!! Come on that's capital punishment"

The Cats' James Kelly unsubtly hinted at his disagreement with the verdict.

"I was going to tweet how Zebel (sic) getting 4 weeks was a mare of a decision but decided not to so I don't get in trouble #smartkell.....smart," he wrote.

Tags: sport, australian-football-league, north-melbourne-3051, geelong-3220

First posted July 20, 2012 19:01:16


View the original article here